Performance Comparison on Biomass Gasification Reactor using Cocoa Pod Husk Waste for Hydrogen Production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36877/aafrj.a0000588Abstract
Biomass is gaining recognition as a valuable renewable energy source due to its plentiful supply and relatively cheaper cost than other energy sources. One significant advantage of biomass is its ability to produce minimal carbon dioxide emissions during gasification. Gasification, which typically employs either downdraft fixed bed or bubbling fluidised bed gasifiers, is favoured for producing hydrogen gas, an essential element for energy production. This process can be represented using the Aspen Plus simulator, which is used for process simulation studies. Nevertheless, simulation research's predominant focus has been exclusively on coal gasification, with comparatively less attention given to biomass gasification. This study uses Aspen Plus software to examine the gasification processes of downdraft fixed-bed and bubbling fluidised bed reactors. Utilising cocoa pod husk as feedstock, both processes were analysed under the same operating conditions. The fluidised bed gasification process produced more hydrogen gas (7.62%) than the fixed-bed reactor (5.84%). A sensitivity analysis evaluated the influence of gasifier temperature and air-to-biomass ratio. It was found that the fixed-bed reactor produced more hydrogen (6.33%) at 760 °C, while the fluidised bed reactor yielded more hydrogen (8.43%) at 740 °C with an air-to-biomass ratio of 0.01. The study further discovered that a steam-to-biomass ratio of 0.15 in the fluidised bed reactor demonstrated the highest hydrogen yield, suggesting this as the optimal operating condition. The study offers vital knowledge on how to optimise biomass gasification operations to enhance the production of hydrogen.
References
Abdulrasheed, A. A., Jalil, A. A., Siang, T. J., & Hambali, H. U. (2020,). Thermodynamic sensitivity analysis of CO2 reforming of methane based on equilibrium predictions. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 808(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/808/1/012001
Akinola, A. O., Eiche, J. F., Owolabi, P. O., & Elegbeleye, A. P. (2018). Pyrolytic analysis of cocoa pod for biofuel production. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 37(4), 1026–1031. https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v37i4.23
Basu, P. (2006). Combustion and gasification in fluidized beds. CRC press.
Begum, S., Rasul, M. G., Akbar, D., et al. (2013). Performance analysis of an integrated fixed bed gasifier model for different biomass feedstocks. Energies, 6(12), 6508–6524. https://doi.org/10.3390/en6126508
Dong, J., Nzihou, A., Chi, Y., et al. (2017). Hydrogen-rich gas production from steam gasification of bio-char in the presence of CaO. Waste and biomass valorization, 8, 2735–2746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9784-X
Figueroa, J. E. J., Ardila, Y. C., Lunelli, B. H., et al. (2013). Evaluation of pyrolysis and steam gasification processes of sugarcane bagasse in a fixed bed reactor. Chemical Engineering, 32.
Inayat, A., Khadim, Q. B., Raza, M., et al. (2019). Biomass gasification in fluidized bed reactors: Evaluation of different heterogeneous models. Processes, 7(7), 471.
Jiang, L., Hu, S., Xiao, Y., Zeng, H., Li, X., & Liu, S. (2020). Influence of steam-to-biomass ratio on biomass gasification in a fluidized bed reactor: Experimental and numerical study. Energy Conversion and Management, 205, 112370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112370
Kiang, Y. H. (2018). Fuel property estimation and combustion process characterization: Conventional fuels, biomass, biocarbon, waste fuels, refuse derived fuel, and other alternative fuels. Academic Press.
Lv, P. M., Xiong, Z. H., Chang, J., et al. (2004). An experimental study on biomass air–steam gasification in a fluidized bed. Bioresource technology, 95(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.019
Mansaray, K. G., Al-Taweel, A. M., Ghaly, A. E., et al. (2000). Mathematical modeling of a fluidized bed rice husk gasifier: Part I-Model development. Energy sources, 22(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908310050041598
Moretti, L., Arpino, F., Cortellessa, G., et al. (2022). Analytical and numerical modelling of biomass gasification in downdraft gasifiers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2177(1), 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2177/1/012028
Muslim, M. B., Saleh, S., Samad, N. A. F. A. (2017). Torrefied biomass gasification: A simulation study by using empty fruit bunch. MATEC Web of Conferences, 131, 03008. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713103008
Muslim, M. B., Saleh, S., Samad, N. A. F. A. (2017). Effects of purification on the hydrogen production in biomass gasification process. Chemical Engineering, 56.
Nikoo M. B., Mahinpey, N. (2008). Simulation of biomass gasification in fluidized bed reactor using Aspen Plus. Biomass and Bioenergy, 1245–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.02.020
Rosendahl, L. (Ed.). (2013). Biomass combustion science, technology and engineering. Elsevier.
Sheth, P. N., Babu, B. V. (2010). Production of hydrogen energy through biomass (waste wood) gasification. International Journal of hydrogen energy, 35(19), 10803–10810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.176
Wahid, F. R. A. A., Muslim, M. B., Saleh, S., et al. (2015). Integrated gasification and fuel cell framework: biomass gasification case. ARPN journal of engineering and applied sciences, 11, 2673–2680.
Xue, Q., Heindel, T. J., Fox, R. O. (2016). Computational fluid dynamics modeling of biomass gasification in a fluidized-bed reactor. AIChE Journal, 62(9), 3227–3242. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15244
Zhang, W. (2010). Automotive fuels from biomass via gasification. Fuel processing technology, 91(8), 866–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.03.006
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Bilal Muslim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher right for the first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under:
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows for the copying, distribution and transmission of the work, provided the correct attribution of the original creator is stated. Adaptation and remixing are also permitted.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access to, as well as the unrestricted reuse of, original works of all types for non-commercial purposes.
The author(s) permits HH Publisher to publish this article that has not been submitted elsewhere.
.png){kind=logo}
.jpg)
