A Review: Extraction Methods of Phenolic Compounds from Rambutan Peel (Nephelium lappaceum L.)

Authors

  • Nurdiana Izwan Hadi Wong
  • Naemaa Mohamad
  • Nadya Hajar
  • Nurul Azlin Tokiman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36877/aafrj.a0000403

Abstract

Rambutan is a tropical fruit native to the ASEAN countries well-known for its refreshing flavour. However, due to the fresh consumption and its short shelf life, the peels are usually discarded as waste in a huge amount. Efforts have been made to reduce the amount of waste by optimally utilising to achieve sustainable development by utilising the peel for industrial applications. The rambutan peels contain a significant number of antioxidants due to the beneficial and nutritive phenolic compounds present. Rambutan peel extract possesses antioxidant, antidiabetic, anti-obesity, antiproliferative, antimicrobial and anticancer properties thus, can be used for application in the food, pharmaceutical and cosmetics industries.  An extraction process is needed to isolate the phenolic compounds from the rambutan peel. Factors such as polarity of solvents, cost, extraction efficiency and extraction time need to be considered in the selected method as it will be implemented in industries. Nevertheless, no review paper has focused on the most suitable extraction method of rambutan peel that possibly can be adopted in the industry. This review paper summarises available extraction methods used to extract the phenolic compounds from rambutan peel and determines the most suitable extraction method that  may be potentially used in industries. From the literature, the ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) method is the most potent method to be applied in the industry.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-20

How to Cite

Wong, N. I. H., Mohamad, N., Hajar, N., & Tokiman, N. A. (2024). A Review: Extraction Methods of Phenolic Compounds from Rambutan Peel (Nephelium lappaceum L.). Advances in Agricultural and Food Research Journal, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.36877/aafrj.a0000403

Issue

Section

REVIEW ARTICLE
Abstract viewed = 64 times
PDF downloaded = 33 times